Doomsday predictions about tomorrow’s global terrorists are very different from what is being seen in India
Ad Code Here
Doomsday predictions about tomorrow’s global terrorists are very different from what is being seen in India INBNews
Introduction
Some experts warn of a doomsday scenario globally. They say that tomorrow may bring a sudden wave of terrorism. The predictions come from data and trend models around the world. But India is not seeing that kind of danger. The real picture there is different. This story looks at both global fears and India’s actual situation.
Global Predictions of Terrorist "Doomsday"
The latest Global Terrorism Index for 2025 shows that worldwide terror deaths fell to 7,555 in 2024. That is a 13 percent drop from 2023—mainly because the big spike after the Hamas October 7 attack raised the previous year’s toll. If we ignore that spike, deaths would have stayed about the same.
Still, some countries like those in the Sahel saw dramatic rises. The region now accounts for over half of all terrorism deaths globally. Terror deaths there have risen nearly tenfold since 2019.
In Western countries, terrorism is changing. Lone-actor attacks are increasing—from 32 in 2023 to 52 in 2024. These attackers often are youths. They are radicalized alone online. That makes it hard for intelligence agencies to intercept
In Europe, the number of terror incidents doubled, rising to 67 in 2024. Many were linked to IS and Hamas. At the same time, hate-motivated violence—especially antisemitic attacks—rose sharply.
This mix of trends feeds the sense that a sudden large wave of terror may erupt—hence the “doomsday” voice. It’s not always about coordinated groups. Instead, it reflects scattered, unpredictable threats from unaffiliated individuals.
Why the Global Picture Feels Alarmist
Experts stress that terrorism continues, but large-scale mass-destruction events remain rare. For instance, terrorists have seldom used chemical, biological, nuclear, or radiological weapons. Most recent attacks are low-level and confined.
Thus, while the rise in lone-actor threats is worrying, the worst fears have not materialized yet. The scale of destruction remains limited in most cases.
That said, some commentators still warn that terrorists with extremist ideologies may eventually seek weapons of mass destruction. But so far, those fears remain theoretical.
India’s Reality: Tensions, Not Doomsday
.jpeg "IBN News")
India faces a different threat landscape. On April 22, 2025, militants killed 26 tourists near Pahalgam in Kashmir. This was one of the deadliest attacks in years. An offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba, The Resistance Front (TRF), claimed responsibility.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) condemned the attack. It said such violence cannot happen without funding and support.
India responded strongly. The prime minister called for firmness. He said the country would act decisively against both attackers and those who support them.(The Times of India)
The External Affairs Minister, S. Jaishankar, said that India would pursue terrorists wherever they may be—even across the border in Pakistan.(The Economic Times, The Times of India)
Strong Political Responses in India
On Buddha Purnima in May 2025, Prime Minister Modi addressed the nation. He said India will not bow to nuclear threats. He emphasized that talks and trade cannot go hand-in-hand with terror. He said "Operation Sindoor" is India’s new normal in responding to terror.(Indiatimes)
The statement reaffirmed India’s readiness to strike back if provoked. It showed a shift to stronger deterrence.(Indiatimes)
Analysts are particularly concerned about Lashkar-e-Taiba. This group has a history of major attacks on Indian soil. It is seen as a potential spark for broader conflict. The US has urged diplomacy to defuse tensions between India and Pakistan.(The Washington Post)
Comparison: Global Alarm vs India’s Focused Reality
Globally, the conversation is about diffuse threats. Lone-actor attacks, hate crimes, unaffiliated extremists. Many fear a sudden "doomsday" due to radicalized individuals acting alone.(Vision of Humanity, RAND Corporation)
In India, the threats are more identifiable. They come from known groups like LeT or TRF. The attack in Pahalgam was tragic, but it was not an apocalyptic event. Instead, it was specific and regional.(Wikipedia)
India's response is clear and strong. Political leaders have vowed decisive action. There are known targets. There is state power engaged. That contrasts with global fears of random, unpredictable violence.
Conclusion
In short, global warnings of a "doomsday" threat of terrorism reflect changing patterns. Lone-actor violence, digital radicalization, hate crimes—all fuel anxiety. But they have not yet led to world-shaking events.
In India, the terrorism challenge remains grave but contained. It comes from known groups and regions. And it is met with firm political and military resolve.
While both threat landscapes are real, they are not the same. Global doomsday predictions are hypothetical today. India’s challenges are concrete—and India aims to meet them now.
0 Response to "Doomsday predictions about tomorrow’s global terrorists are very different from what is being seen in India"
Post a Comment